Engineering knowledge where the work lives.
Design reviews, threaded comments, real-time co-editing, and decisions tied to the entities they're about. No more design history scattered across Slack, email, and PowerPoint.
Keeps the discussion where the engineering artifact lives
'%3e%3cpath%20d='M13.513%2035.76a2.433%202.433%200%200%201-2.059-3.723l4.377-6.99a2.432%202.432%200%201%201%204.123%202.582l-4.378%206.99a2.43%202.43%200%200%201-2.063%201.141z'%20fill='%23ff3d57'/%3e%3cpath%20d='M21.056%2035.76a2.433%202.433%200%200%201-2.063-3.723l4.38-6.99a2.432%202.432%200%201%201%204.117%202.582l-4.372%206.99a2.43%202.43%200%200%201-2.063%201.141z'%20fill='%23ffcb00'/%3e%3cellipse%20ry='2.375'%20rx='2.436'%20cy='33.384'%20cx='28.597'%20fill='%2300d647'/%3e%3c/g%3e%3c/svg%3e){kind=small}
Real-time co-editing.
Multiple engineers in the same metamodel, the same BOM, the same requirements list. Cursor positions, live edits, presence indicators. Conflict-free, audited.
Design reviews with structure.
Formal review workflows: define the scope, invite reviewers, capture decisions, lock the outcome under a baseline. Replaces the email-and-Excel checklist nightmare.
Lock and reviseEvery change. Every decision. Forever.
Audit trail is not an afterthought. It's the substrate. Who changed what, when, why, and which baseline locked it. Exportable as PDF for ISO 13485 and AS9100 audits.
Audit-ready traceabilityWhat you get back when design history stops living in inboxes.
The decisions are already being made. The question is whether anyone can find them two years later.
Discussion attached to the artifact
A thread lives on the requirement, the BOM line or the baseline it is about, so the rationale never gets separated from the object.
Reviews that end in something immutable
Scope, reviewers, comments and decision, with the outcome locked under a baseline rather than a signed-off email.
Every action attributed
Who changed what, when, why, and which baseline locked it, for humans, connectors and AI agents alike.